Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Diggs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 21, 2014No. CR-13-0746Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJoiner, Judge

I concur in the Court’s judgment reversing Ellis Andrei Diggs’s conviction on the basis that Diggs was entitled to an instruction on self-defense under § 13A-3-23(a)(1), Ala.Code 1975. I dissent, however, from the main opinion’s apparent holding that Diggs was also entitled to an additional instruction under § 13A-3-23(b), Ala.Code 1975, that he had no duty to retreat under the circumstances presented here.

“In Kidd v. State, [105 So.3d 1261 (Ala.Crim.App.2012) ], Kidd argued that ‘the trial court’s jury instruction regarding self-defense was misleading because, he said, it was contrary to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Kidd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. George v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API