Legal Opinion

Ex parte Gray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 30, 1983No. 11-83-173-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKENSON, Justice.

In this habeas corpus proceeding the only issue is whether the Motion for Contempt and Order Setting Hearing gave sufficient notice. Relator, Joe Glenn Gray, insists that the notice was not sufficient and that he should be discharged from an illegal confinement. We disagree. He will be remanded to the custody of the sheriff.

The trial court’s order of April 28, 1983, reads in full as follows:

The Clerk will issue notice to Respondent, Joe Glenn Gray, to appear, and Respondent is hereby ordered to appear, before this Court on the 26th day of May, 1983, at 9:00 o’clock a.m., at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ex Parte BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ex Parte StanfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Ex Parte Combs, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Natin Paul v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2023
  2. in Re: Pursuit of Excellence, Inc., Pursuit of Excellence Texas, LLC, Marie Diaz, C. John Scheef, Anna S. Brooks, and Brandy K. Chambers, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API