Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hausken v. Coman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1936No. File No. 6379Published

1Dissent

The majority opinion clarifies the situation thoroughly so far as the facts and circumstances are concerned. There was ample evidence sustaining all of the material issues in the case — the relations of parties defendant to each other, negligence of the defendants, contributory negligence of the deceased, and all other issues pertinent to the case — and these were resolved by the jury in favor of the plaintiff.

The case is reversed and sent back for a new trial because of a negative and an affirmative act on the part of the court.

It is said the court should have instructed on the doctrine of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kunkel v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Ignatowitch v. McLaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Lindblom v. SonstelieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Northwestern National Bank v. HowlettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API