Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Borough of Stroudsburg
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 1996PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
The Borough of Stroudsburg (Borough) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (trial court) reversing the Borough Council’s denial of Charles A Schmidt’s (Police Officer) claim that overtime wages are included in “salary fixed by ordinance or resolution” for the purposes of calculating benefits paid by the Borough to Police Officer under the Pennsylvania Heart and Lung Act (Heart and Lung Act).1
Police Officer, while in the course of his employment with the Borough, sustained a work-related injury and was disabled from February 11, 1992 through…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Salerno v. LaBarrCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Colyer v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Borough of Beaver v. ListonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In re Appeal of Suspension of McClellanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Sofronski v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Township of Ridley v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 27Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Horner v. Borough of CaliforniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Celi v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.