Legal Opinion

John a. Tolman Co. v. McClure

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1894No. 1,165PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

Action by the appellant against the appellees on a contract of guaranty. Answer in general denial. Trial by -jury. Verdict and judgment for the appellees, the defendants below. The only error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial.

It is averred in the amended complaint, that the appellant corporation, on the 16th day of October, 1890, entered into a certain agreement, in writing, with one Samuel L. McClure, in substance and to the effect following, viz.: “Chicago, October 16, ’90. This memorandum certifies: engaged Samuel McClure as. salesman to solicit orders for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. WinchelIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John A. Tolman Co. v. RiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Jenkins v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Rice v. John A. Tolman Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  4. Sturgeon Bay & Lake Michigan Ship Canal & Harbor Co. v. LeathamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API