Utu Utu Gwaitu Paiute Tribe of the Benton Paiute Resrvation v. Department of Interior
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHUBB, District Judge.
The court heard oral argument on August 19, 1991 on plaintiff’s application for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Defendants opposed the application on two grounds. First, defendants contend plaintiff’s application is premature because defendants have appealed. Second, defendants argue that even if the application is timely, an award of fees is not appropriate because the position of defendants was “substantially justified.”
DISCUSSION
A. Timeliness
On August 5, 1991, the defendants filed a notice of appeal…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- George L. Barry v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Tripoli Rocketry Ass'n v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- In re Interest of A.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- In re Interest of A.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- SIERRA CLUB NORTHSTAR CHAPTER v. KimbellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.