Legal Opinion

Hillsborough County v. NCJ Investment Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 30, 1992No. 91-02436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEHAN, Chief Judge.

We affirm the declaratory judgment which ruled that under the Hillsborough County Zoning Regulations a so-called “minor” modification of a Community Unit (CU) District site development plan was properly approved by a three to two majority vote of members of the Board of County Commissioners at a properly constituted meeting of the Commission and did not require for its approval four votes of that seven-member body. There does not appear to be any dispute that the modification at issue was a “minor” modification.

In so ruling the trial court construed the Hillsborough County…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thayer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Marchesano v. NATIONWIDE PROP. & CAS. INS.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. NATIONWIDE PROP. & CAS. v. MarchesanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Pfeiffer v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Moretrench American Corp. v. TAYLOR WOODROW CONST. CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kraemer v. GMACDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API