Hillsborough County v. NCJ Investment Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LEHAN, Chief Judge.
We affirm the declaratory judgment which ruled that under the Hillsborough County Zoning Regulations a so-called “minor” modification of a Community Unit (CU) District site development plan was properly approved by a three to two majority vote of members of the Board of County Commissioners at a properly constituted meeting of the Commission and did not require for its approval four votes of that seven-member body. There does not appear to be any dispute that the modification at issue was a “minor” modification.
In so ruling the trial court construed the Hillsborough County…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thayer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Marchesano v. NATIONWIDE PROP. & CAS. INS.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- NATIONWIDE PROP. & CAS. v. MarchesanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Pfeiffer v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Moretrench American Corp. v. TAYLOR WOODROW CONST. CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kraemer v. GMACDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992