Legal Opinion

Clem v. Meserole

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the. cttert.

1Opinion of the Court

Peje Curiam.

TMi® cause; being reached in its regular order on the •docket was referred by the court to its commissioners for investigation, who report the same recommending affirmance. . y

Upon due consideration the court finds that the original and amended bills in the case alleged the complainant, appellant, to be the owner of the legal title to certain real •estate in Orange county, and that a certain judgment, •sheriff’s sale and deed thereunder of said premises, and certain subsequent conveyances thereof by the purchaser at t ssuch sheriff’ sale ■ and certain subsequent mortgages thereof…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sloan v. SloanSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  2. Brown v. SolarySupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. Haworth v. NorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  4. Graham v. Florida Land & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
  5. Levy v. LaddSupreme Court of Florida · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tibbetts v. OlsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Morgan v. DunwoodySupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  3. Law v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  4. Simmons v. CarltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  5. Ropes v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API