Legal Opinion

In Re: Halftone Color Separations ('809) Patent Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 10, 2008No. MDL 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel *: Canon U.S.A., Inc., Eastman Kodak Co., Panasonic Corp. of North America, Ricoh Americas Corp., Kyocera Mita America, Inc., and Konica Minolta Business Solutions Inc. have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in the Western District of Washington or, in the alternative, the Central District of California. This litigation currently consists of five actions, two actions in the District of Delaware and one action each in the Central District of California, the Eastern District of Texas, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re: Joann PatenaudepetitionersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re Merscorp Inc., Real Estate Settlement Proc. Act (Respa) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2007
  3. In Re Mattel, Inc., Toy Lead Paint Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lucey v. Prudential InsuranceUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  2. In Re Prudential Ins. Co. of America sgli/vgliUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API