Legal Opinion

Gray v. Buck

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 10, 1886Published

ON exceptions to the ruling of the court in ordering a nonsuit. The opinion states the case and material facts.

1Opinion of the CourtEwery, J.

In this case there was evidence from which a jury might find tiie following as facts.

The brig, "Isaac Carver,” was practically owned in the following proportions: Marls Gray, (plaintiff) one-eighth; William D. Swasey, one-eighth; Joseph L. Buck, (defendant) one-fourth, and O. M. Gray, (the master) one-half. The *478master’s part was held by the plaintiff, awaiting payment therefor, but that half is not involved in this case. O. M. Gray procured insurance on his half, independently of the other owners. Mark Gray (the plaintiff) applied to the defendant, who was agent for the vessel, to procure…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. LeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  2. Dunham v. GillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  3. Bunn v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1805

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API