Legal Opinion

State v. Creekpaum

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided February 13, 1987No. A-1228PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether a retroactive extension of the statute of limitations in a criminal case violates the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws. We conclude that it does.

On May 17, 1985, Robert C. Creekpaum was indicted for one count of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of AS 11.41.410(a). The assault was alleged to have occurred more than five years previously, on March 12,1980. At that time, the general five-year statute of limitations was applicable to the offense. See AS 12.10.-010. In 1983, the Alaska…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  4. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. BargeronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. State v. CreekpaumAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. MouserCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  5. Murphy v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API