Legal Opinion

Dayton Reavis Corporation v. Rampart Capital Corporation

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided March 4, 1998No. 10-97-00249-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Dayton Reavis Corporation, et al. v. Rampart Capital Corporation, et al.

[WITHDRAWN 4-29-98]

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-97-249-CV

DAYTON REAVIS CORPORATION,

ET AL.,

Appellants

v.

RAMPART CAPITAL CORPORATION,

ET AL.,

Appellees

From the 77th District Court

Limestone County, Texas

Trial Court # 24,295-A

O P I N I O N

We affirm a conditional interlocutory order appointing a receiver to take control of certain property that is the subject of disputed claims.

THE DISPUTE

Rampart Capital Corporation (Rampart) owned a note dated May 30, 1985, signed by Cameron Henderson Oil Company, Inc. (CHOC), payable to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Balias v. Balias, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Bergeron v. SessionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Abella v. Knight Oil Tools, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API