Legal Opinion

People v. Lummis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1932No. Docket No. 167, Calendar No. 36,115PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Defendant here seeks review of his conviction on the charge of having committed the crime of rape upon the person of Lucile Button, a female child of the age of 14 years. The young girl’s mother was the wife of the defendant. The offense was alleged to have been committed on or about the first day of February, 1931.

It is urged that no “specific act of intercourse” was “pointed out or segregated” on which conviction might be had. Lucile testified:

“About the first of February last I was living on Harrison street and I had intercourse with my stepfather.
“Q. How many times?
“Mr. Barnard: I object…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wellar v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. People v. TamosaitisMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. WhittemoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. EddyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. People v. HenshawMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. KernMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. People v. ZabijakMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People v. TubbsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. BarkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. IvyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API