Euler v. City of Pittsburgh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The verdicts in favor of the respective plaintiffs settle all disputed questions of fact in their favor.
Walter Euler, a boy eleven years old, had his arm badly crushed and broken by getting it caught between the wall of a house and a heavily loaded'cable reel, which had been left on the sidewalk of a public street by the city authorities, without any block or'other contrivance to keep it from rolling or being rolled by children.
The reel, with the lead cable wound around it, weighed about a thousand pounds. The cable was intended for use in the city’s fire alarm police…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rachmel v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Wallace v. Keystone Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Everett v. DelpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boyle v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Bonczek v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Lemak v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Reichvalder v. Borough of TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Chambers v. Ellis, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.