Legal Opinion

Euler v. City of Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1925No. Appeals, 11 and 12PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The verdicts in favor of the respective plaintiffs settle all disputed questions of fact in their favor.

Walter Euler, a boy eleven years old, had his arm badly crushed and broken by getting it caught between the wall of a house and a heavily loaded'cable reel, which had been left on the sidewalk of a public street by the city authorities, without any block or'other contrivance to keep it from rolling or being rolled by children.

The reel, with the lead cable wound around it, weighed about a thousand pounds. The cable was intended for use in the city’s fire alarm police…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rachmel v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Wallace v. Keystone Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Everett v. DelpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Bonczek v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Lemak v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Reichvalder v. Borough of TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Chambers v. Ellis, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API