Legal Opinion
United States v. Daoust
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 1, 2018No. 17-1234PPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
*574 Defendant-appellant Robert Daoust mounts a multi-pronged challenge to the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release term. Concluding, as we do, that his claims of sentencing error are futile, we affirm the sentence.
I. BACKGROUND
We briefly rehearse the facts and travel of the case. In 2010, the appellant pleaded guilty to possession of heroin with intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). The district court sentenced him to a seven-year term of immurement, to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. The appellant's prison…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. ClogstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Tanco-PizarroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Colon-MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Rivera-BerriosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Flores-QuinonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. PupoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.