Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cupp v. Naughten

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1973No. 72-1148PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

414 U.S. 141 (1973)

CUPP, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT

v.

NAUGHTEN.

No. 72-1148.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 16, 1973.

Decided December 4, 1973.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

John W. Osburn, Solicitor General of Oregon, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Denney and John H. Clough, Assistant Attorneys General.

Ross R. Runkel, by appointment of the Court, 412 U. S. 904, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · RehnquistJustice Rehnquist

Respondent Naughten was tried in an Oregon state court for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. (HC) Anthony L. Zeigler v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (HC) Arguello v. MunizDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (HC) Bottenfield v. RobertsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Duarte v. LizzaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (HC) Foster v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API