Legal Opinion
Martin v. Hudson Valley Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., based on medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, etc., the defendants Hudson Valley Associates, Christine Beer, and Margaret Reither appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), dated January 16, 2004, as denied those branches of their motion which were to dismiss the second cause of action based on lack of informed consent, and to strike all references to lack of informed consent from the plaintiffs’ bills of particulars.
Ordered that the order is reversed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sample v. LevadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Hecht v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Schel v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Campea v. MitraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brady v. Westchester County Healthcare Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Samer v. DesaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Reid v. SoultsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Thomas v. FarragoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Danziger v. MayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.