Institute of London Underwriters v. First Horizon Insurance Company, First Horizon Insurance Company v. Institute of London Underwriters
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:
In these two cases, a primary insurance carrier seeks from an excess carrier contribution for costs of defending its insured; the excess carrier seeks a declaratory judgment that it owes no defense costs to the primary carrier. On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court held that the excess carrier’s policy unambiguously relieves the excess carrier from the duty to defend and, therefore, the cost of defense. It also found no authority for the primary carrier’s claim for equitable subro-gation. We affirm for the same reasons.
A. The Policies’ Provisions on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moody v. ArabieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Albany Insurance Company v. Anh Thi KieuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Trinity Universal InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- Great SW Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Albany Insurance v. Anh Thi KieuSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cone Mills Corp. v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. Of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Cna Insurance Companies and Columbia Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Society of the Roman Catholic Church of the Diocese of Lafayette, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Hudson v. Forest Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- XL Specialty Insurance v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.