Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Thrashing-machine Co. v. Currey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1907No. 14,926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Leavenworth district court; James H. Gillpatrick, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

This is a suit to recover judgment on three promissory notes and foreclose a real-estate mortgage given to secure their payment. The defendants in an unverified general denial admitted the execution of the notes and mortgage, but by way of further answer and cross-petition pleaded the entire transaction, *367of which the notes and mortgage mentioned in the petition were only a part. The pleading stated, in substance, that the defendants purchased a steam thrashing outfit of the plaintiff, for which they gave the three notes sued on and six…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. McCarthySupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Goodman v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  3. Flint v. Dulany & McVeighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. ThayerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Solomon v. LamplSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Marks v. HowkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API