Bright v. United States
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MICHEAL BRIGHT, ) ) Movant, ) ) No. 3:19-cv-00790 v. ) Judge Trauger ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM Pending before the court is pro se movant Micheal Bright’s motion and supplement to the motion under
28 U.S.C. § 2255
to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence previously imposed by this court. (Doc. Nos. 1, 7). The government filed a response to the motion, urging that Bright’s motion should be denied on two independently sufficient grounds. (Doc. No. 11). For the following reasons, Bright’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- United States v. GoochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Robert Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.