Legal Opinion

Bright v. United States

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided August 31, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00790Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MICHEAL BRIGHT, ) ) Movant, ) ) No. 3:19-cv-00790 v. ) Judge Trauger ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM Pending before the court is pro se movant Micheal Bright’s motion and supplement to the motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence previously imposed by this court. (Doc. Nos. 1, 7). The government filed a response to the motion, urging that Bright’s motion should be denied on two independently sufficient grounds. (Doc. No. 11). For the following reasons, Bright’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. United States v. GoochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. Robert Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API