James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentWieand, Judge
The majority has concluded that the notice requirement contained in the Metropolitan Transportation Authorities Act of August 14, 1963, P.L. 984, § 36, 66 P.S. 2036,1 constitutes a violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and is unconstitutional. In order to achieve this result, the author of the lead opinion has employed the intermediate or “heightened scrutiny” level of *523review. Because I am persuaded by applicable authority that the standard of review utilized is incorrect and because I disagree with the result achieved, I must respectfully, but vigorously,…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.