Legal Opinion

Riedel v. Fenasci

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 2018No. NUMBER 2018 CA 0538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhipple, C.J.

*997This matter is before us on appeal by defendant-in-reconvention, Deborah Riedel, from a judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs-in-reconvention, Frank and Theresa Cali. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY1

On April 25, 2014, Riedel, with the assistance of real estate agent Angie Fenasci, entered into a purchase agreement for a condominium located at 2700 Rue St. Martin, Unit A, in Hammond, Louisiana, that was owned by Frank and Theresa Cali.2 On that same date, Riedel also completed an "Owner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Bank v. SaxenaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. AM. BANK & TR. CO. IN MONROE v. Carson Homes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Hancock Bank of Louisiana v. C & O Enterprises, LLCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  4. Hancock Bank of Louisiana v. C & O Enterprises, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. First Bank & Trust v. SharpLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riedel v. FenasciLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Riedel v. FenasciLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API