Legal Opinion

NEPTUNE v. CAREY

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 21, 2020No. 3:17-cv-12057Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LOUIS NEPTUNE, Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-12057 (BRM) Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM v. OPINION ANDREW CAREY, et al., Defendants. Before the Court is pro se plaintiff Louis Neptune’s (“Plaintiff”) filing of an “Amended Motion to Reopen and Reconsideration” (ECF No. 51), “Motion to Reopen Case and Reconsideration of 2nd Amended Claim” (ECF No. 56), and “Motion to Change Venue” (ECF No. 60). Having reviewed the submissions filed in connection with the motions, for the reasons set forth below, and for good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s motions are DENIED.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. NL Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  2. Herring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Pro Spice, Inc. v. Omni Trade Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API