Mann v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Indictment for Seduction. In Fulton Superior Court. Motion for neiv trial. Decided by Judge Big-ham. April Term, 1864. By consent of Counsel, this case, which was returned to the last Term at Atlanta, was transferred for argument and decision to the present Term at Milledgeville. Mann, the plaintiff in error, was tried in Fulton Superior Court, at the April Term, 1864, for the offence of seduction.
Read the full summary
Indictment for Seduction. In Fulton Superior Court. Motion for neiv trial. Decided by Judge Big-ham. April Term, 1864. By consent of Counsel, this case, which was returned to the last Term at Atlanta, was transferred for argument and decision to the present Term at Milledgeville. Mann, the plaintiff in error, was tried in Fulton Superior Court, at the April Term, 1864, for the offence of seduction. The time of the commission of the offence, as laid in the Indictment, was the 10th day of September, 1863 ; and as proven by ,the testimony of the prosecutrix, it was in August, 1863. Tiie…
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, O. J.
In truth, there scarcely is any point to be decided by the Court in this case. The only ground of alleged error relied on by the Counsel for the plaintiff, and on which he contends that the judgment of the Court below ought to be reversed, is that of newly discovered evidence; and from the admission of the Solicitor General, which is in accordance with the facts, as certified to by the Judge, his objection was not taken at the proper time, but only stated when he was making his argument.
But waiving this irregularity, and considering the point as taken at the proper time, what is…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Keller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Penniston v. City of NewnanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Hanson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.