Legal Opinion
Amerdyne Industries, Inc. v. Pom, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1985No. 84-1801PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Amerdyne Industries, Inc. (Amerdyne) brought this diversity action against POM, Inc. (POM) for a refund of $25,000 earnest money paid pursuant to a written agreement entered into by the two corporations. Following a bench trial, the District Court 1 dismissed Amerdyne’s complaint. Amer-dyne appealed, arguing that the District Court’s decision is not based on substantial evidence. We affirm.
In September 1979, Amerdyne and POM signed a letter of intent setting forth the terms of an agreement between them. The agreement consisted of a proposal by Amerdyne to purchase the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arkansas Rock & Gravel Co. v. Chris-T-Emulsion Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Johnson v. MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- APCO Oil Corp. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Arkansas Aviation Sales, Inc. v. Carter Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
3Cited by12 opinions
- American Business Interiors, Inc. v. Haworth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Union National Bank of Little Rock v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & PilotsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Logue v. Seven-Hot Springs Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. International Organization of Masters, Mates, & PilotsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.