Legal Opinion

Darnall & Susong v. Darlington

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 20, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McIver.

On May 19, 1885, the defendant gave his note payable to the plaintiffs on November 15, 1885, and to secure the payment thereof executed a mortgage on three mules. The mortgage contained the usual provision that upon default the mortgagees could take possession of the mortgaged property and sell the same for cash “after giving notice by advertisement, by posting notice fifteen days at Allendale Post-office, and shall apply the proceeds of said sale to the discharge of said debt, interest and expenses, and pay any surplus to the said…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Castell v. Stephenson Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Johnson Cotton Co. v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Fretwell v. CarterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  5. Fowler v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API