Legal Opinion
Bryan v. Graham
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1907No. Civ. No. 310PublishedCited by 1 opinion
The facts are shown in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Appeal from judgment and order denying motion for new trial.
This proceeding arises out of conflicting claims of the parties due to the fact that both were applicants to purchase a quarter section of land under “An Act regulating the sale of the lands uncovered by the recession or drainage of the waters of inland lakes,” etc., as enacted in 1893 (Stats. 1893, p. 341), and amended 1899 (Stats. 1899, p. 182). The land in question is a part of the territory uncovered by the receding waters of Tulare lake in Kings county. The application of the respondent was - made December 14, 1904, and that of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lamb v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Adams v. ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Rose v. Nevada & Grass Valley Wood & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
- Phillips v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Thompson v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.