Hecla Mining Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
This case involves an appeal from the district court’s grant .of summary judgment. The district court refused to declare plaintiffs land parcels part of a government-funded cleanup program and refused to order defendants to undertake remedial action at the sites.
I. Facts
Hecla Mining Company owns two parcels near Naturita, Colorado. The first parcel, the Naturita parcel, was used to produce uranium for contracts with the United States government from 1939 to 1963. This production resulted in over 600,000 tons of waste known as tailings. In 1977, Ranchers Exploration and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Osgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Railroad Yardmasters of America v. Robert O. Harris, Chairman, National Mediation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- R-G Denver, Ltd. v. First City Holdings of Colorado, Inc., Robert H. Goodman, Mortab, Ltd., and First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Myron Durtsche, Jr. v. American Colloid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Mill v. State, Department of HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- New Mexico Department Of Human Services v. Department Of Health And Human Services Health Care Financing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.