Legal Opinion

Town of East Haven v. Town of Derby

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 15, 1865PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of removal of a pauper. The defendant moved to quash the proceedings for reasons set forth in the opinion. The court at the September Term, 1864, Poland, Ch. J., presiding, sustained, the motion and ordered that the order of removal be quashed, — to which the plaintiff excepted.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Peck, J.

The case was entered in the county court at the March Term, A. D. 1864, at which time the defendant town filed a motion to quash the proceedings, alleging in the motion that the pauper has never been removed to the town of Derby, and that no copy of said order of removal, certified by the parties making the order, was left with the overseer of the town of Derby within thirty days after the making of the order, nor at any other time.

This motion and the argument of the defendant’s counsel in support of it rest upon the ground that at the date of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Town of Marshfield v. Town of CalaisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844
  2. Town of Poultney v. Town of SandgateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  3. Town of Sharon v. Town of StraffordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alvey v. HartwigCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  2. Town of Landgrove v. Town of PlymouthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API