Legal Opinion

Beard v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1936No. Appeal, 9PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadteeld, J.,

The action is assumpsit by the beneficiary named in an industrial life insurance policy against the company. The case was heard upon statement of claim, affidavit of defense, and answer to new matter. Plaintiff took rule for judgment on the pleadings, and defendant filed rule for judgment for want of sufficient reply to new matter.

Both rules were heard together. The court discharged plaintiff’s rule and entered judgment in favor of defendant, in an opinion by Piekakski, J.

Meri Hrvojevic the insured, took out a policy of life insurance in defendant company on January…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Bond v. BuntingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. Smith v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Brennan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. McNally v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Orhowski, Admx. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Kitt v. Philadelphia-United Life InsurancePennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1947
  3. Ryan v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API