Legal Opinion

Cross v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 8, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYATT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move for summary judgment in an action for the recovery of that part *158of their income tax for the year 1954 alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected. 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.

The action and this motion involve the deductibility of expenses of a visit in Europe by a college professor of languages. Internal Revenue Code of 1954, § 162(a); Regulations, 26 C.F.R. § 1.162-5.

The cited Code provision allows as a deduction “ordinary and necessary expenses” of a “trade or business”.

The cited part of the Income Tax Regulations…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Carlucci v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  3. Hill v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  4. Coughlin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  5. Evelyn and John Paul Devereaux v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ephraim Cross and Mary Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. Marlin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  3. Cross v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. Marlin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API