Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Urban Compass, Inc
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 21, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2019-0340Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JILL SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-00340 (CJN) ALEXANDRA THOMAS SCHWARTZ, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER A jury found Counter-Defendant Jill Schwartz liable for defaming her former colleague, Alexandra Thomas Schwartz (“Thomas”). The matter is now before the Court on Schwartz’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial (“Counter-Def.’s Mot.”), ECF No. 118. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies the Motion. “The legal standard for granting a renewed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Meijer, Inc. v. Biovail Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- In Re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Hubert PHILOGENE, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Et Al., DefendantsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.