Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Florida Bar v. Hall

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 26, 2010No. SC07-863Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPariente, J.

In this case, the majority has rejected the recommendation of the referee to impose a ninety-day suspension and has instead disbarred Hall. I understand that this Court has demonstrated in no uncertain terms that lawyer misconduct will not be tolerated and that harsher sanctions are warranted for many forms of lawyer misconduct. I agree that forgeries by a lawyer should not be tolerated and warrant substantial discipline.

However, while Hall’s misconduct requires a rehabilitative suspension, I disagree that the extreme sanction of disbarment is warranted under the facts of this case and our…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. The Florida Bar v. KickliterSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. The Florida Bar v. HagendorfSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  4. The Florida Bar v. CramerSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  5. The Florida Bar v. SolomonSupreme Court of Florida · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API