Legal Opinion

Hagler v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1994No. 94-0746PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Per curiam

Don Hagler, a forty year employee of Procter & Gamble (P & G), was stopped taking a telephone he believed he owned from the P & G Dallas plant. After an investigation into the incident, the managers of the Dallas P & G plant voted to terminate Hagler for violating P & G’s rule prohibiting theft of company property. The plant manager posted a notice of Hagler’s termination for theft on bulletin boards throughout the plant. The notice remained posted for eight days. Hagler sued Procter & Gamble for libel. The trial court concluded that P & G was entitled to claim qualified privilege in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. Hagler, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  3. Damian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Allen Chadwick Burbage v. W. Kirk Burbage and Burbage Funeral HomeTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Alaniz v. Hoyt, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  4. Knox v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Odem, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API