Legal Opinion

ER Urgent Care Management Co. v. Spuza (In re ER Urgent Care Holdings, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided February 14, 2012No. Bankruptcy Nos. 08-25688-BKC-LMI, 08-26530-BKC-LMI; Adversary No. 09-02340-LMIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT FELICIA SPUZA’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS

LAUREL MYERSON ISICOFF, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (ECF # 52) (the “Motion for Attorney Fees”). The Court has reviewed the Defendant’s Motion, the Plaintiffs Response to Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (ECF # 57), the Plaintiffs Brief on Defendant’s Entitlement to Only an Unsecured Claim for Attorney Fees and Costs (ECF # 58), Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Attorney…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Reading Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. 12 Collier bankr.cas.2d 686, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,275 in Re Charlesbank Laundry, Inc., Debtor. Shepard A. Spunt v. Charlesbank Laundry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. In Re Subscription Television Of Greater Atlanta, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edgewater Construction Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API