Legal Opinion
United States v. Wild
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 13, 1996No. 95-10857PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal in two parts of a judgment of conviction. Appellant first raises constitutional claims under the Sixth Amendment. Then he argues that the district court improperly sentenced him. For the following reasons we affirm the judgment below.
BACKGROUND
In June 1991, appellant James L. Wild helped form a company called Hi-Tech Phones in Houston, Texas. Prior to this time, Wild sold vending machines and had no particular background in the telephone business. In 1990 he and several others started a company called Hi-Tech for the purpose of marketing pay telephones…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Leslie Lowenfield v. C. Paul Phelps, Secretary of the Department of Corrections, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Larry WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Marina Medina Marco Antonio Martinez Javier Alberto DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Stokley AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Bruner v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
- Ricks v. DMA CompaniesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.