Amoco Production Co. v. Wyoming State Board of Equalization
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[¶ 1] Amoco Production Company (Amo-eo) challenges the assessment and taxation of underground oil flow lines as personal property. We find that the Carbon County Assessor properly categorized the flow lines as personal property and, therefore, we affirm the decision of the State Board of Equalization (State Board) confirming that decision.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Amoco presents the following issues:
1. Was the Decision of the State Board of Equalization Supported by Substantial Evidence?
2. Was the decision of the State Board of Equalization contrary to the weight of the evidence in the record?
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Laramie County Board of Equalization v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Boothbay Harbor Condominiums, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- RT Communications, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- BP America Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Devon Energy Production, Lp v. Grayson Mill Operating, LlcWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Welu v. Twin Hearts Smiling Horses, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
- Milnes v. MilnesWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.