Hancock v. Luke
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. Geo. G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by George B. Hancock against Francis G. Luke and another. Judgment on the pleadings for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
1DissentMcCARTY, J.
I, too, am of the opinion that the complaint states a canse of action. Taking the answer by the four corners, and assuming all the matters therein alleged that are not in conflict with the provisions of the contract to be true, plaintiff is entitled to recover. It is suggested that the specific denials of the answer, aided by the general denial and the affirmative matters pleaded therein, “put in issue the charging part of the complaint.” If this is true, then,.of course, the defendants were entitled to a trial on the merits. ■ I think, however, an examination of the pleadings will show that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dolan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Humboldt Min. Co. v. American Manufacturing, Mining & Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Hawthorne v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1867
- Richardson v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1894
- Price v. Western Loan & Savings Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.