Legal Opinion

State v. Gill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 1975No. C 74-11-3645 CrPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

The state has appealed, pursuant to ORS 138.060 (1), from an order of the circuit court requiring disclosure of the name of a police informant. Police testified in an in camera hearing preceding trial that an undisclosed informant, previously found to be reliable, told them defendant was in the Hilltop Cafe and had in possession Ritalin, a prohibited dangerous drug. ORS 167.202 et seq., 475.010. That location was one of three lcnown-to-police locations where Ritalin was available in the Portland area. They knew defendant. They had used the informer in a similar role several times, paying him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. CortmanOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. State v. JessieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schmid v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lewandowski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Lewandowski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API