Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp. v. Harris

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 26, 1932No. 13496Published

1Concurrence

Mr. ChiEE Justice BeEase

(concurring) : I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bonham for the following reasons: The property in question was purchased by Eawton, the tenant, on January-6, 1928, and on that day he executed the title retaining contract covering the property. The defendant, the landlord, did not rent the premises until February 1, 1928, and the rent contract was entered upon on the 9th day of February. The property was not brought upon the premises until after February 1, 1928. The landlord hdd no lien on the property in question for rent. Fidelity Trust & Mortgage Co. v. Davis,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fidelity Trust & Mortgage Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. Simpson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API