Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 2003No. COA01-1504Published

1DissentGeer, Judge

Because I believe that the trial court improperly shifted the burden of proof to defendant regarding the voluntariness of his confes*154sions and his competency to waive his Miranda rights, I respectfully dissent. I would reverse and remand for a new hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress.

As the majority notes, a trial court’s findings of fact are conclusive on appeal as long as they are supported by competent evidence, even if the record contains conflicting evidence. State v. Eason, 336 N.C. 730, 445 S.E.2d 917 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096, 130 L. Ed. 2d 661 (1995). When, however,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API