Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1924No. 15578PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwortit, J.

1. The judge did not abuse his discretion in • reopening the case and allowing the evidence introduced of which complaint is made in the first special ground of the motion for a new trial. In Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Blalock, 8 Ga. App. 44, 48 (68 S. E. 743), Judge Bussell said: “As, in the broader light of out advancing intelligence, we more plainly see that the object of the trial is to reach the truth, the less is a progressive profession inclined to tolerate the observance of any technical rule which will tend only to test the skill and vigilance of the counsel, when it is at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  2. Ellenberg v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Cone v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API