Legal Opinion
In Re Schneiderman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 2000No. 99-00521PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADDRESSING MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL
S. MARTIN TEEL, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
The Chase Manhattan Bank (“Chase”) seeks a stay pending appeal of the portion of the court’s Order Approving Compromise and Settlement of Claims and Sale of Assets that required Chase to dismiss its pending Motion to Satisfy a Judgment by Garnishment Pursuant to Section 16-579 of the District of Columbia Code (“the Garnishment Motion”) pending in the case of The Chase Manhattan Bank v. Milton Schneiderman, Case No. 1:97CV02719 (TFH), in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Soares v. Brockton Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- William Wayne Picco v. Global Marine Drilling Company, and Crosbie Offshore Services, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Phillip Duncan Bronson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kanipe v. First Tennessee Bank (In Re Kanipe)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2002
- In Re FeldmanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Keeler v. Academy of American Franciscan History, Inc. (In Re Keeler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- In Re BowersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010