Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Wicklund

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1940No. 32,333Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, a judgment creditor of defendant A. W. Hample, who died on March 21, 1938, instituted this action, after a writ of execution had been returned unsatisfied, against defendants to have the transfer of decedent’s business and assets, as a sole trader, to defendant corporation and certain conveyances of real estate by decedent to defendant Wicldund set aside as fraudulent. At the close of the plaintiff’s case defendants moved for a dismissal. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law to the effect that plaintiff was not entitled to relief,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lind v. O. N. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Cash v. Concordia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Flanigan v. PomeroySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Tunell v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API