Legal Opinion

In Re Steele's Estate

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1954No. 32792PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for the probate of a will. The petition was denied on the ground that the will had been revoked by the testator’s subsequent marriage.

The facts are not in dispute. For about two years prior to March 18, 1948, George E. Steele was engaged to be married to Betty Ann Bergman. On that date, he executed the will in question. In it, he made no mention of Betty Ann Bergman other than as contained in the following dis-positive clauses:

“All of my estate, of whatever name or character, both legal and equitable estates, whether real, personal or mixed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bower v. BowerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Adler v. AdlerWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Peiffer v. Old National Bank & Union Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In Re Bauer's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Purdy v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Poisl v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. In Re Hamilton's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Matter of Estate of BurmeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. White v. Conference Endowment CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Porter v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API