Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Chicago Park District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1985No. 83-2611PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Defendants Edmund Kelly (superintendent of the Chicago park district), Rick Halprin (general attorney for the park district), the park district itself, William Lee, Sidney Marovitz, Iola McGowan, John McHugh, and William Bartholomay (all members of the park district board when this suit was filed) appeal from the circuit court’s order of partial summary judgment declaring that plaintiff, Horace Lindsey, had been wrongfully discharged without a hearing from his position as superintendent of employment for the park district and reserving the issue of damages.

We find that we have no jurisdiction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. BarthIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Martino v. BarraIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Salyers v. BD. OF GOVERNORS OF STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIESAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Harold Butler Enterprises 662, Inc. v. Underwriters at LloydsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Sadler v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. RichardsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Mar Cement, Inc. v. Diorio Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Eychaner v. GrossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Charter Bank v. EckertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Bauman v. PattersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API