Legal Opinion
Chin Ching v. Nagle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 25, 1931No. 6426PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
■ Chin Ching, a male Chinese, bom on April 22, 1909, arrived in San Francisco on May 28, 1980, and applied for admission into the United States on the ground that he is the foreign-bom son of Chin Kim, a native-born citizen. His application was denied by the Board of Special Inquiry on the ground that the relationship was not established, and upon appeal this excluding decision was affirmed by the Secretary of Labor. Application was then made to the District Court for a writ of habeas corpus, and froip the order denying same this appeal is taken. The sole question…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Kwock Jan Fat v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Lewis v. FrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States Ex Rel. Tisi v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Zakonaite v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Been v. ProctorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Lum Sha You v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Yep Suey Ning v. BerkshireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Dong Ah Lon v. ProctorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Ex parte WienkeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.