Legal Opinion

State v. Ahart

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 29, 1982No. 67487PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether an officer’s warrantless entry by ruse and without cause into a private home provides probable cause for a subsequent warranted search at which incriminating evidence is seized. Michael Ahart contends that evidence seized during the search of his home was obtained illegally and should have been suppressed. Consequently, he argues that his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of Iowa Code § 204.401(3) (1981) should be reversed. We hold that if the police effect a ruse to obtain entry to a home based only on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Ted E. OakesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Jerry D. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State Of Iowa Vs. James Maximiliano OchoaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. State v. NaujoksSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. United States v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. State v. BreuerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. State v. ReinierSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API