Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Griffith v. Davis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 17, 1924No. 25,668; No. 25,602; No. 25,649PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS IN MANDAMUS. MEMORANDUM OF DECISIONS.

1Opinion of the Court

The decisions of the court were announced by

Burch, J.:

These actions, in form actions of mandamus, were commenced to test validity of the work of the commission to revise the statutes. The governor’s .case involves inclusion in the assembled sections referred to by the legislature in section 1, chapter 144, of the act of 1923, entitled “An act relating to the Revised Statutes of 1923,” of a law which had been repealed in 1909. The auditor’s case involves the revision of the municipal bond laws, and the mayor’s case involves the revision of the municipal street-improvement laws. The question is…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex parte HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Berg v. BergNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Hockaday Auto Supply Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API