In re Syntax-Brillian Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING MOTIONS TO PROCEED QUI TAM UNDER THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT2
BY: KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Before the Court is the Motion of Ahmed Amr (the “Movant”) to Proceed *325Qui Tam under the False Claims Act (D.I. 2329) (the “Qui Tam Motion”). Eleven former shareholders (none represented by counsel) filed motions in support of the Qui Tam Motion.3 The SB Liquidation Trust and Greenberg Traurig, LLP filed objections to the Qui Tam Motion. For the reasons stated below, the Qui Tam Motion will be denied.
Background
On July 8, 2008, the Debtors each filed voluntary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roland A. Leblanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States Ex Rel. Schumann v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Wilkins v. United Health Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- In Re Resorts International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Peter N. Georgiades v. Helen Martin-Trigona, Anthony R. Martin-Trigona, Peter N. Georgiades v. Helen Martin-TrigonaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.